Editorial Policy & Review Process

Who writes and reviews

My Zodiac AI Team is the organizational byline for this site's AI-assisted astrology content. Founder essays may retain their original founder byline. Former named author profiles were generated editorial personas. They did not represent individual experts, professional qualifications, or personal work experience.

AI tools assist with drafting, translation, and content checks. A team byline does not certify human review or native-language review. Review coverage varies by article and language; the complete archive is being reassessed. Astrology content is for reflection, not medical, psychological, legal, or financial advice.

Sources policy

• Astronomical facts should be checked against published astronomical sources or documented ephemeris calculations. Calculation accuracy does not validate astrological interpretations.
• Wellness-adjacent topics (sleep, cycles, habit formation) cite peer-reviewed research or systematic reviews where they exist; astrology is presented as a reflective framework, never as the causal explanation.
• Claims about studies, institutions, and measurements should link to a source that supports them. Unsupported claims are corrected or removed during the archive review.

Health-adjacent articles

Articles about sleep, stress, breathing, mood or the menstrual cycle follow a stricter standard, because readers may act on them:

• Evidence and astrology are kept in separate sections. Astrology is offered as a theme for reflection, never as the cause, diagnosis or treatment of a body, mood or sleep state.
• Research claims cite peer-reviewed studies found through PubMed, preferably systematic reviews, meta-analyses or large cohorts. Each source carries a PMID or DOI and a year. Preprints are not used for health claims.
• We do not diagnose, recommend medication, supplements or doses, give pregnancy verdicts, or present any tool as contraception or fertility planning. Where symptoms are mentioned, the article says when to talk to a doctor.
• Each article ends with a medical disclaimer. A "Reviewed by" stamp appears only when a named person has run the health checklist on the stated date. It records an editorial check, not a medical credential.

Claims gate

Automated checks flag potentially unsupported guarantees, medical or financial promises, and fabricated statistics. These checks are advisory: they cannot establish factual accuracy or prove that every article is safe. Flagged claims require source verification. Wellness topics must distinguish evidence from astrological reflection.

Review checklist

Our review checklist is a standard to work toward, not a claim that every archived article has passed:

1. Facts and dates verified against the ephemeris or cited sources.
2. No medical, legal, or financial advice presented as such.
3. Title and description match what the page actually delivers.
4. Internal links resolve (no redirect hops, no dead ends).
5. Structured data (Article, FAQ) matches visible content.
6. Translation checked against the English source, with the review method recorded.

Corrections

Found an error? Write to support@my-zodiac-ai.com. Verified errors are fixed and the article's updated date changes; material corrections to facts or dates are noted in the article itself.

How we use AI

We use AI for drafting, translation, and automated screening. Chart positions are calculated separately from generated interpretations. AI output can contain factual errors, unsupported claims, and translation mistakes. We do not claim that the entire archive has received human review. A model's safety label is not editorial approval.